2006 Audi TT vs. 1953 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (180 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1953 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 400 kg more than 1953 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1953 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | Crestline |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1785 cc | 3929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2940 mm |
