2006 Audi TT vs. 1954 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1954 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | 12 M |
Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2500 mm |