2006 Audi TT vs. 1958 Land Rover 109
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Land Rover 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Land Rover 109 would be higher. At 2,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Land Rover 109 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (225 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1958 Land Rover 109. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1958 Land Rover 109. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Land Rover 109 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (281 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Land Rover 109. (157 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Land Rover 109.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1958 Land Rover 109 | |
Make | Audi | Land Rover |
Model | TT | 109 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2285 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2780 mm |