2006 Audi TT vs. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 250 kg more than 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Audi | Studebaker |
Model | TT | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2980 mm |