2006 Audi TT vs. 1962 DAF 750
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 664 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1962 DAF 750 | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | TT | 750 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 31 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.8 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 7.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 662 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2060 mm |
