2006 Audi TT vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (221 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 615 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | TT | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 53 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 33 L |