2006 Audi TT vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,785 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (180 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 770 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Audi | DKW |
Model | TT | Munga |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1785 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 31 L |