2006 Audi TT vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 1132 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | R 360 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 63 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |