2006 Audi TT vs. 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | TT | Fleetwood |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3300 mm |
