2006 Audi TT vs. 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | TT | Fleetwood |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3300 mm |
