2006 Audi TT vs. 1964 Sunbeam Imp
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Imp would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 1133 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1964 Sunbeam Imp | |
| Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
| Model | TT | Imp |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 875 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 747 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2090 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 27 L |
