2006 Audi TT vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 120 kg more than 2006 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Caprice |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 6476 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3030 mm |