2006 Audi TT vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (236 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1011 kg more than 2006 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Audi | Lincoln |
Model | TT | Continental |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 236 HP | 284 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 2406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |