2006 Audi TT vs. 1967 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1967 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | TT | Charger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3194 cc | 6981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |