2006 Audi TT vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 245 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3194 cc | 3930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |