2006 Audi TT vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 680 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Zastava 850 K. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | TT | 850 K |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2010 mm |