2006 Audi TT vs. 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 878 kg more than 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette.
Because 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | TT | Aerovette |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1785 cc | 6556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2430 mm |
