2006 Audi TT vs. 1973 Citroen SM
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen SM would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (250 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1973 Citroen SM. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen SM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Citroen SM. (233 Nm). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1973 Citroen SM | |
Make | Audi | Citroen |
Model | TT | SM |
Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 233 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 74.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2960 mm |