2006 Audi TT vs. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (178 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (135 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 229 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (271 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1980 Chevrolet El Camino | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | TT | El Camino |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 135 HP |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2980 mm |
