2006 Audi TT vs. 1980 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 55 kg more than 1980 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1980 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2760 mm |