2006 Audi TT vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 776 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | TT | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2160 mm |