2006 Audi TT vs. 1982 Bristol 412
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol 412 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Because 1982 Bristol 412 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bristol 412. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1982 Bristol 412 | |
Make | Audi | Bristol |
Model | TT | 412 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2910 mm |