2006 Audi TT vs. 1982 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 245 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1982 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | TT | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2560 mm |