2006 Audi TT vs. 1982 Holden Camira
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,785 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (180 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 840 kg more than 1982 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1982 Holden Camira | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | TT | Camira |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1785 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2580 mm |