2006 Audi TT vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 590 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TT | Celeste |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2350 mm |
