2006 Audi TT vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Starion
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Starion would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (247 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Starion.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1982 Mitsubishi Starion | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TT | Starion |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 145 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
