2006 Audi TT vs. 1982 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 260 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1982 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Audi | Plymouth |
Model | TT | Reliant |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2260 mm |