2006 Audi TT vs. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 385 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1984 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | Cimarron |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2580 mm |