2006 Audi TT vs. 1985 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 400 kg more than 1985 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1985 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | TT | Cougar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2650 mm |