2006 Audi TT vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 3,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (250 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 145 kg more than 1986 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3194 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 99 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 68.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3030 mm |