2006 Audi TT vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT.

Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Audi TT 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model TT Camaro
Year Released 2006 1989
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1753 cc 5735 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 178 HP 238 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4300 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 467 Nm
Torque RPM 1950 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80.8 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 88.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2580 mm