2006 Audi TT vs. 1994 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercury Villager weights approximately 520 kg more than 2006 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1994 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | TT | Villager |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2860 mm |