2006 Audi TT vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (247 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 230 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | TT | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2490 mm |