2006 Audi TT vs. 1997 Caterham C21
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Caterham C21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Caterham C21 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Caterham C21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Caterham C21 (250 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Caterham C21 should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 845 kg more than 1997 Caterham C21.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Caterham C21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (281 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Caterham C21. (252 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Caterham C21.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1997 Caterham C21 | |
Make | Audi | Caterham |
Model | TT | C21 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2260 mm |