2006 Audi TT vs. 1997 Rover 400
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1997 Rover 400. (110 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (282 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1997 Rover 400 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 400 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2560 mm |