2006 Audi TT vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 50 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Challenger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1785 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2730 mm |