2006 Audi TT vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 566 kg more than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder.
Because 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder | |
| Make | Audi | Plymouth |
| Model | TT | Pronto Spyder |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1785 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1314 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 46 L |
