2006 Audi TT vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 839 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Rover Mini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1998 Rover Mini | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | Mini |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 94 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 696 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2750 mm |