2006 Audi TT vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 600 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | TT | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |
