2006 Audi TT vs. 2000 BMW 328
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 328 would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2000 BMW 328. (201 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 65 kg more than 2000 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW 328. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 328. (279 Nm). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 2000 BMW 328 | |
| Make | Audi | BMW |
| Model | TT | 328 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2977 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2730 mm |
