2006 Audi TT vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 368 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Astro |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3194 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |