2006 Audi TT vs. 2000 GMC Safari

To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 511 kg more than 2006 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.

Compare all specifications: