2006 Audi TT vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 106 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2000 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
