2006 Audi TT vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (250 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 443 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Tracker |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 127 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2490 mm |