2006 Audi TT vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 95 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Tracker |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2210 mm |