2006 Audi TT vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2006 Audi TT. (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 412 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 2002 BMW M3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | TT | M3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 3997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 480 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2890 mm |