2006 Audi TT vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 3,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 287 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan X-Trail.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Audi TT 2002 Nissan X-Trail
Make Audi Nissan
Model TT X-Trail
Year Released 2006 2002
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3194 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 250 HP 177 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 9.5:1
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1555 kg 1842 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 60 L