2006 Audi TT vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2002 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (178 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 576 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | TT | Covie |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 2950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 35 L |
