2006 Audi TT vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 3,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 810 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Audi | ZAZ |
| Model | TT | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3194 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2330 mm |
