2006 Audi TT vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (247 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 75 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi TT | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
| Make | Audi | GMC |
| Model | TT | Canyon |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 93.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 72 L |
